Comments on: [Movie Review] AVATAR (3D)

By: HAZMAT

HAZMAT — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:28:40 +0000

Grundy
I had the same though as well

The first trailer actually looked like a video game, it was such a let down. I had no plans in seeing it

But i guess they werent done with the CGI when i saw those trailers and once it came out, it looked really good.

your comment leads me to this:
Movies should completely finish with the film before they release trailers
For the obvious reasons we stated above (CGI looks like shit in the trailer, movie looks bad, bad advertising)

And so that we dont see trailers in december 09 and have them ****ing say “COMING SUMMER 2016″
I hate that so much ^^^

By: Kristina

Kristina — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:25:14 +0000

Boy oh boy, some folk around heer are gonna slaughter me after I write up my review.

And YES, I will be writing up a review. My computer still has not been fixed, but screw it, I owe you guys reviews and I want to write again, so I’m borrowing my sister’s laptop. It’s been a hectic year, but I’ve got the time to bust out these reviews now. So over the next few days you can look forward to reviews of Avatar, Harry Potter, Where The wild Things Are, Paranormal Activity, Nine, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, District 9, Gamer, Law Abiding Citizen, and a couple of surprise entires. Trust me, I got plenty of time to pop these out.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:46:10 +0000

I’m struggling to remember a better movie – ever. The story line is nothing unusual, standard Shakesperian fare, but the way in which it is delivered is truly exceptional. The concept and its execution is breathtaking and involves the viewer totally. By the end of the movie, some 160 minutes, you are left wondering why it had ended so soon. Fantastic. And I haven’t even mentioned how good the 3D was, not overly “in your face” – sometimes less IS more.

By: Gazz

Gazz — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:28:26 +0000

I did pay mention to the 3D element in the review. As i said “… This is 3D done right, finally. It is handled in a way where someone eventually comprehends that it is not about throwing things out of the screen at you, but in creating a depth of field within the screen that immerses you inside the film and not the film spilling out of the screen at you…”
It, for me, was an extremely immersive experience.
And the colours didn’t feel at all as muted as they normally do in a 3D movie.

By: Grundy

Grundy — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:23:29 +0000

Shit wrong one. Disregard the previous post.

As for Avatar, I really wasn’t too interested in seeing it, nothing really caught my eye with the trailers, clip previews etc…

I’m still unsure whether or not I’m going to be seeing it tomorrow or not, but this was a good review and and added a nudge into me seeing it.

Oh, and how was the 3D for it? You seemed to have skipped over that part. Is it worth the extra money to see it in 3D?

By: Grundy

Grundy — Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:19:14 +0000

Looks great, I have a feeling that it is going to dethrone Spider-Man 2 as the best made comic book film. That’s just a hunch, it looks lie Faverau hit it out of the park with this one, and seemed to have learned a lot about shooting action sequences.