<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [DVD Review (R2)] HER NAME IS SABINE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/reviews/dvd-reviews-r2/dvd-review-r2-her-name-is-sabine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/reviews/dvd-reviews-r2/dvd-review-r2-her-name-is-sabine/</link>
	<description>The place for movie geeks and obsessives!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 00:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/reviews/dvd-reviews-r2/dvd-review-r2-her-name-is-sabine/comment-page-1/#comment-3396</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/?p=2476#comment-3396</guid>
		<description>Did I forget to mention why I said that? Well, mainly it&#039;s because reviews are easier when there&#039;s something to critique - like acting. Now, if a documentary is boring then I should imagine it&#039;d be quite easy to rip it apart but this, which is by no means boring, I found very hard to put into words.

And no, I had no problems with the subject matter. Things like this, even if they&#039;re upsetting, don&#039;t cause me problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did I forget to mention why I said that? Well, mainly it&#8217;s because reviews are easier when there&#8217;s something to critique &#8211; like acting. Now, if a documentary is boring then I should imagine it&#8217;d be quite easy to rip it apart but this, which is by no means boring, I found very hard to put into words.</p>
<p>And no, I had no problems with the subject matter. Things like this, even if they&#8217;re upsetting, don&#8217;t cause me problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazz</title>
		<link>http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/reviews/dvd-reviews-r2/dvd-review-r2-her-name-is-sabine/comment-page-1/#comment-3382</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/?p=2476#comment-3382</guid>
		<description>I work with people with learning disabilities and in an environment given coverage in this documentary. I&#039;d say there were a lot of severely valid and well made points on the subject made within the documentary. It IS an &quot;enjoyable&quot; experience in so much as the feelings it makes you consider within yourself and the questions it pushes you to ask. &quot;Enjoyable&quot; as in &quot;throwaway entertainment&quot; in the style of Michael Moore or what not? Nooooo! 

Very good review though mate! One question though: You open your review with...

&quot;I don’t very often review documentaries. And after watching this, I’ve realised why! I love documentaries, I really do, but I’m really not looking forward to reviewing one ever again!&quot;

But you don&#039;t really pay mention as to why you&#039;re not looking forward to reviewing one again? Why is it? This wasn&#039;t so bad that it put you off in terms of quality? So is it the subject matter? Has it made you more cautious? I didn&#039;t understand that bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with people with learning disabilities and in an environment given coverage in this documentary. I&#8217;d say there were a lot of severely valid and well made points on the subject made within the documentary. It IS an &#8220;enjoyable&#8221; experience in so much as the feelings it makes you consider within yourself and the questions it pushes you to ask. &#8220;Enjoyable&#8221; as in &#8220;throwaway entertainment&#8221; in the style of Michael Moore or what not? Nooooo! </p>
<p>Very good review though mate! One question though: You open your review with&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I don’t very often review documentaries. And after watching this, I’ve realised why! I love documentaries, I really do, but I’m really not looking forward to reviewing one ever again!&#8221;</p>
<p>But you don&#8217;t really pay mention as to why you&#8217;re not looking forward to reviewing one again? Why is it? This wasn&#8217;t so bad that it put you off in terms of quality? So is it the subject matter? Has it made you more cautious? I didn&#8217;t understand that bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

