<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE INDISPENSIBLES &#8211; #5: RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/features/indispensibles-features/the-indispensibles-5-raiders-of-the-lost-ark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/features/indispensibles-features/the-indispensibles-5-raiders-of-the-lost-ark/</link>
	<description>The place for movie geeks and obsessives!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:22:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: THE INDISPENSIBLES - The Bibliography &#124; Stale Popcorn</title>
		<link>http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/features/indispensibles-features/the-indispensibles-5-raiders-of-the-lost-ark/comment-page-1/#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator>THE INDISPENSIBLES - The Bibliography &#124; Stale Popcorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/?p=2961#comment-4729</guid>
		<description>[...] THE INDISPENSIBLES - #5: RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARKby: Gazz [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] THE INDISPENSIBLES &#8211; #5: RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARKby: Gazz [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotorietyH</title>
		<link>http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/features/indispensibles-features/the-indispensibles-5-raiders-of-the-lost-ark/comment-page-1/#comment-4652</link>
		<dc:creator>NotorietyH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stalepopcorn.co.uk/?p=2961#comment-4652</guid>
		<description>I was skeptical of Selleck as Indy first but when I saw the screen test I thought he wasn&#039;t half bad as Indy and probably would&#039;ve done a good job as him. Maybe notas good as Ford, but good nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was skeptical of Selleck as Indy first but when I saw the screen test I thought he wasn&#8217;t half bad as Indy and probably would&#8217;ve done a good job as him. Maybe notas good as Ford, but good nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
